Xtreme Tennis News
 

Mary Pierce: Tennis-X 5 Questions

General tennis talk and discussion

Moderators: mimi, funches, ccm, Kevin, mariam, consafos, srockter, louise, ChrisM

Mary Pierce: Tennis-X 5 Questions

Postby XBot on Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:05 am

<b>Mary Pierce: Tennis-X 5 Questions</b><br><br><IMG hspace=5 src="http://www.tennis-x.com/images/players/pierce_rg.jpg" align=right vspace=5 border=2>France's Mary Pierce has been a drain on the WTA medical plan, with a laundry list of injuries over the last five years alone including right rotator cuff tendonitis, tendonitis in both ankles, chronic inflammation of the lumbar spine, a major abdominal strain, and late last year another shoulder injury. <BR><BR>But now the 30-year-old Pierce, who used her injury down-time wisely and appears to be in great shape, enters the 2005 claycourt season, one of her favorite legs of the year, injury free.<BR><BR>Pierce has won 16 titles since turning pro 16 years ago, and reached a career-high No. 3 on the WTA Tour Rankings in 1995. While the title count is not extraordinarily large, the quality of the trophies are, with Pierce almost certain to end her career as one of the few players to win two slams (1995 Australian Open, 2000 French Open) without reaching No. 1.<BR><BR>Tennis-X caught up with Pierce earlier this month at Amelia Island to grill the French powerhouse on her current physical status, and what it takes to top the rankings in these modern times:<BR><BR><B><I>Tennis-X: You had a tough start to the year, but it seemed you turned the corner at Indian Wells with your wins over (Nicole) Vaidisova and (Nadia) Petrova, was there a mental turning point, did you feel anything or was it just playing better?<BR><BR></B>Mary Pierce: No, I think for me, with my shoulder injury I couldn't play for two months, it just took me time to get the shoulder strong to get confident in using it again, getting the power 100 percent, being able to train tennis-wise because physically I was able to train (off-court) so I felt well, pretty good. I felt I had to spend two or three months on the court before I felt like my game was going to come back together, and it's been those two or three months now.<BR><BR><B>X: How are you physically now, 100 percent?<BR><BR></B>MP: Uh-huh, great, I'm feeling really good.<BR><BR><B>X: In Indian Wells you talked about what a player needs to become No. 1 nowadays. It seems like there is a "big banger" camp and an "all-court" camp -- I want to run the names of the players likely to be in the race for the year-end No. 1, and I want to see what camp you put them in.<BR><BR></B>MP: Okay.<BR><BR><B>X: (Lindsay) Davenport.<BR><BR></B>MP: (Exhales, pauses) Hmmmmmm....that's a tough one...yeah, because she's not afraid to come into the net, but she doesn't come in a lot, so...that's tough. She's just good all-around...<BR><BR><B>X: What about (Amelie) Mauresmo?<BR><BR></B>MP: Mauresmoooooooo...yeah, all-around.<BR><BR><B>X: (Maria) Sharapova?<BR><BR></B>MP: Sharapova's a big banger.<BR><BR><B>X: Venus (Williams)?<BR><BR></B>MP: More a big banger.<BR><BR><B>X: Serena:<BR><BR></B>MP: A big banger.<BR><BR><B>X: How about the two Belgians?<BR><BR></B>MP: Kimmmmmm, and Justine I would say, all-around.<BR><BR><B>X: Do you think a big banger can take No. 1 again, like Serena and Venus did?<BR><BR></B>MP: Uhhhhh -- you know I think you have to be able to play at the net and be able to play at the baseline and defend. Have a good serve, you need all those things nowadays because the girls are quick -- big serves, good returns -- fit, you need to have it all really. I mean the big banger can, its just tougher.<BR><BR><B>X: You and Mauresmo missed the Fed Cup final last year, you with the injury -- is Fed Cup really a big deal to the players, or has interest been waning?<BR><BR></B>MP: It really depends on the individual, if they want to play it and put it in their schedule or not. I really love it because it's fun, I love to get together with the girls for a week and we train and eat together and hang out and support each other when we play our matches, and for me it's nice and different, during the year when we're doing our own thing, you know.<BR><BR><B>X: 2000 was the last year you finished Top 20, what's between you and achieving that ranking level again -- is it more mental, physical?<BR><BR></B>MP: It's just time. I think I really feel like I'm playing well, I can compete with the top players -- I beat Petrova last week, she was 12 in the world and I beat her 2-and-2. You know, I think just time, that I play tournaments and have consistence results and my ranking will just follow with that.<BR><BR><B>X: Thanks Mary.<BR></I></B>&nbsp;<BR>Trivia note: Who is the youngest American woman to turn pro? In 1989 it was Mary Pierce, who qualified to the main draw at Hilton Head in her first WTA event at 14 years and two months of age. Jennifer Capriati broke the record the following year in 1990, turning pro at age 5 (or something like that). Two years after her debut Pierce finished in the Top 100, the next year the Top 20, two years later the Top 10, then the following year won her first slam in Australia.<BR>
XBot
 
Posts: 860
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 11:12 am

Postby BeerMe on Mon Apr 18, 2005 7:13 am

Thats whack, two grand slams without even reaching the Number two ranking.
User avatar
BeerMe
 
Posts: 1002
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:53 am
Location: Georgia

Postby Conrad on Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:59 am

No way in hell is Kim Clijsters an all-courter. She's about as all-courter as Jennifer "You mean there's more to the court than the baseline?" Capriati.
Dieu et mon droit
Conrad
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:20 am
Location: Game. Set. Match

Postby varun on Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:32 pm

Conrad wrote:No way in hell is Kim Clijsters an all-courter. She's about as all-courter as Jennifer "You mean there's more to the court than the baseline?" Capriati.


I think her definition of all-courter is someone who does more than stand in the middle of the base-line and keep hitting bam-bam-thank-you-maam groundstrokes.

I agree with you that Kim is not an all-courter, though she does have more variety than most top women players.
varun
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 1:02 pm

Postby varun on Mon Apr 18, 2005 1:35 pm

BeerMe wrote:Thats whack, two grand slams without even reaching the Number two ranking.


Yup. Compare that to another current French woman player who's been to number 1 and hasn't won a single grand slam.
varun
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 1:02 pm

Postby funkyshot on Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:10 pm

X: (Maria) Sharapova?

MP: Sharapova's a big banger.

X: Do you think a big banger can take No. 1 again, like Serena and Venus did?

MP: Uhhhhh -- you know I think you have to be able to play at the net and be able to play at the baseline and defend. Have a good serve, you need all those things nowadays because the girls are quick -- big serves, good returns -- fit, you need to have it all really. I mean the big banger can, its just tougher.


Mary, Maria Sharapova will be number one, better get used to it :lol:
Btw, Davenport is a big-banger!
"There are things known and there are things unknown, and in between are the doors of perception" ~~ Aldous Huxley
User avatar
funkyshot
 
Posts: 147
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2005 2:12 pm

Postby Conrad on Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:13 pm

funkyshot wrote:Btw, Davenport is a big-banger!


Amen.
Dieu et mon droit
Conrad
 
Posts: 1193
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:20 am
Location: Game. Set. Match

Postby atptour03 on Mon Apr 18, 2005 6:25 pm

i really hope mary pierce can make some runs at the grand slams. i have always liked the way she plays. i believe she was one of the original BIG BABES. hopefully, she will get more fit. she probaly will be around for a while, i say she's got about 5 years left, taking into account all the injuries she's had and the time spent off because of them.
atptour03
 
Posts: 179
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:22 am

Postby Richard on Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:05 pm

Jennifer Capriati broke the record the following year in 1990, turning pro at age 5 (or something like that).
:lol:
"Stop right where you are. You know the score pal. If you're not cop, you're little people." - Blade Runner 1981
Bryant, to Deckard....

The movie quote of our time.
Richard
 
Posts: 528
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:22 pm
Location: Tucson, Ariz...

Postby PierceCheng on Tue Apr 19, 2005 2:55 am

Xbot, thans for your article!

By the way, I wish Mary Pierce can comeback the top 10 soon!! :roll:
"I don't die not to live. I don't yield if my wish does not fulfilled. I never die with regret." - Picks from video game "IKARUGA"
User avatar
PierceCheng
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 7:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby vms on Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:00 pm

If the CURRENT ranking system had been around when Pierce won her slams (1995 and 2000) she would have been #1. In 1997, she was the Aussie Open Finalist and reached the 4th round at the other 3 majors -- that would probably have gotten her to #1 on today's ranking system as well. But the PREVIOUS ranking system was a combination of points accrued divided by a set number of tournaments (17, I believe) so you had to play, and play consistently to reach #1. Certain players, who shall go nameless, would never have reached #1 playing just 10 tournaments a year no matter how many of those wins were grand slams.
vms
vms
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 10:07 am

Postby atptour03 on Tue Apr 19, 2005 4:57 pm

vms wrote:Certain players, who shall go nameless, would never have reached #1 playing just 10 tournaments a year no matter how many of those wins were grand slams.


Actually today's ranking system is pretty much the same, because it should award those who actually have won grand slams. i don't think the computer rankings should reward those who play 20 tournaments and get to number one and don't even win a grand slam. and the players your are talking about are i'm sure venus and serena. even though they didn't play as many tournaments as say clijsters or mauresmo; the sisters number one ranking was richly deserved.
atptour03
 
Posts: 179
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:22 am

Postby BeerMe on Wed Apr 20, 2005 8:58 am

Yeah, why dont one of you you rankings trolls who do your own concurrent version of the wta rankings in a dark corner of you basement look that up.
User avatar
BeerMe
 
Posts: 1002
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:53 am
Location: Georgia

Postby atptour03 on Wed Apr 20, 2005 5:09 pm

BeerMe wrote:Yeah, why dont one of you you rankings trolls who do your own concurrent version of the wta rankings in a dark corner of you basement look that up.


what?
atptour03
 
Posts: 179
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 12:22 am


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron
Copyright © 2003-2008 Tennis-X.com. All rights reserved.
This website is an independently operated source of news and information and is not affiliated with any professional organization.