but in the interests of being more constructive, even though i doubt my op will count for naught, here'd be my scorecard:
pnace: first: get a new handle, dude. some good thought and some good energy, but you make the reader work a little too much with no paragraphing. and try to work a little harder on developing some original phrasing e.g. "chucky" "big babe". . kinda done.
DStern127: first entry: good topic, nice theory, but i'd cut out most of the history lesson and focus on now. style-wise, you could use a bit more colour and less reliance on old-school essay style structure. second entry: kinda lost me there content-wise, but
heh, more of that.". . . Rafael Nadal pluck at his clam digger's crannies.
setpoint: the topic of roddick's slump has been worked over a little much already. and again, this is more of a general opinion piece than a blog entry. blogs are a commentary on what's now.
CraigP: first entry: nice structure, an easy read. good title. i like that you didn't just focus on one player. if you were going to take it a little further, i'd say try to tighten up your phrasing and rely less on the sports cliches. second entry: good idea, but could use some sharpening.
jaypatrick: ditto, easy to read. some good snark, some good observations. but i'd reach a little more for subject matter.
passingshots: cute idea, if not terribly original. could have used an editor. and i would have liked to see you push the humour a little further.
nlgonsal: sorry, you lost me at
. that just gave me a Richard vibe. no offense, Richard.A beautiful amazona. . .
and, no, i couldn't do better. way too lazy, way too ill-informed, way too little actual tennis coverage up here.