Xtreme Tennis News
 

2006 Tennis-X Blogging Contest

General tennis talk and discussion

Moderators: mimi, funches, ccm, Kevin, mariam, consafos, srockter, louise, ChrisM

Serena Supernova

Postby nlgonsal on Sat Mar 25, 2006 4:27 pm

Serena Supernova


She could have been the greatest women’s player of all time. Better than Graf, Navratilova, Evert, Court, King. A beautiful amazona, a tennis player with both the skills and the persona to rule the tour. And during those years from 2002-2003, she did. Sure she just blew her opponents off court with her raw power, but it was also her strength of will, the desire to win, the apparent emotion that made her so watchable. You hoped that if Serena and her sister Venus, would meet again and again (as they did during and around the years of the Serena Slam), they would begin to realize that incorporating variety like volleys and backhand slices (WTA players not named Hingis & Mauresmo are going “Huh?â€
Last edited by nlgonsal on Sun Mar 26, 2006 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
nlgonsal
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:06 pm

Postby BeerMe on Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:19 pm

passingshots wrote:The ESPN Classic Indian Wells Highlight Show...Didn't You See It?

Cliff Drysdale: Warm welcome everyone…Cliff Drysdale here, Patrick McEnroe along side. You’re watching the special ESPN2 Pacific Life Open at Indian Wells highlight show. We’ve got—uh, beg your pardon, folks—we’ve just been notified by our producers that ESPN2 is now going to show the NCAA women’s basketball tournament, which is also showing on ESPN. And coming up after that is The World Trick-Shot Billiard Championships—so you are now warmly invited to join us on ESPN Classic for our highlight show.
[Yours truly, highly annoyed, searches for the TV remote controls and switches to ESPN Classic]


too much transcript, not enough blogging. difficult to read. back to the drawing board, interesting effort.
"Leela: Your face can take a lot of punishment. That’s good to know.
Fry: There’s a lot about my face you don’t know."
-- Futurama
User avatar
BeerMe
 
Posts: 1002
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 11:53 am
Location: Georgia

Postby clarity on Sat Mar 25, 2006 11:05 pm

Beerme, you obviously didn't get Passingshots post. I found it hilarious. Passingshots managed in a very clever way (through a conversation between Cliff Drysdale and Patrick McEnroe) to summarize the Indian Wells tournament and at the same time get digs in at ESPN's poor coverage and at Cliff Drysdale for his abnormal preoccupation with Andy Roddick.


You didn't find it entertaining the way he captured Cliff and Patrick's word choice and speech patterns so well? You need to go back and reread it.
clarity
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 10:47 pm

Postby passingshots on Sat Mar 25, 2006 11:34 pm

clarity wrote:Beerme, you obviously didn't get Passingshots post. I found it hilarious. Passingshots managed in a very clever way (through a conversation between Cliff Drysdale and Patrick McEnroe) to summarize the Indian Wells tournament and at the same time get digs in at ESPN's poor coverage and at Cliff Drysdale for his abnormal preoccupation with Andy Roddick.


You didn't find it entertaining the way he captured Cliff and Patrick's word choice and speech patterns so well? You need to go back and reread it.


Hey, thanks for your compliments. I know who you are.

Maybe Beerme is right. Maybe his isn't the right way to go about this whole thing.

On the other hand, the first three or four posters were criticized for all sounding the same. I tried to write something totally different and it wasn't received all that well either. Is anything going to please you guys? :roll:
passingshots
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 1:06 pm

Postby tds2711 on Sun Mar 26, 2006 1:11 am

i think it's important to not try to "please" people. also, it's not about writing something that people definitely agree with either. it's about provoking thought, being clever, funny, interesting, factual, etc.

that's why blogging is cool. it's not news reporting. you can be opinionated -- meaning most people wont like or agree with your style or opinion.

good luck to everyone. so far i like DStern and jaypatrick.

but that's just my opinion.
tds2711
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:19 pm

Postby varun on Sun Mar 26, 2006 1:14 pm

passingshots wrote:The ESPN Classic Indian Wells Highlight Show...Didn't You See It?

Cliff Drysdale: Warm welcome everyone…Cliff Drysdale here, Patrick McEnroe along side. You’re watching the special ESPN2 Pacific Life Open at Indian Wells highlight show. We’ve got—uh, beg your pardon, folks—we’ve just been notified by our producers that ESPN2 is now going to show the NCAA women’s basketball tournament, which is also showing on ESPN. And coming up after that is The World Trick-Shot Billiard Championships—so you are now warmly invited to join us on ESPN Classic for our highlight show.
[Yours truly, highly annoyed, searches for the TV remote controls and switches to ESPN Classic]
Cliff: Warm welcome everybody, I’m Cliff Drysdale, Patrick McEnroe along side. We’ve had a sensational week of tennis here in Indian Wells. Without a doubt, the story of the tournament was Igor Andreev, who had to play absolutely spectacularly to beat world no. 3, former U.S. Open champion, two-time Wimbledon runner up, and holder of 20 ATP tour titles, Andy Roddick.
Patrick McEnroe: Well, that was a shocker Cliff. I don’t know if it was the story of the tournament—
Cliff: Let’s take a look at some highlights from Roddick’s first two matches, which Roddick won in a very convincing manner.
Patrick: Actually, Cliff, I think we’re cued up to watch the highlights from Andre Agassi’s matches first.
Cliff: Oh, sorry PMac. Of course, Andre Agassi came into the tournament as the no. 2 American player in the world, behind Andy Roddick.
Patrick: Agassi struggled against American Paul Goldstein in his first match. He actually got a code violation for smashing a racquet during the second set. And then during the third set, there was a little controversy when Agassi became concerned about the slipperiness of the court. He wanted play to be suspended, but both the umpire and the tournament director, Gerry Armstrong, checked the courts and made the decision that the courts were not a danger to the players…
[YT, talking to the TV: Pff. Concerned about the slipperiness? More like, concerned about losing to the 63rd ranked player in the world.]
Patrick: …after Goldstein slipped they did stop play for a few minutes. After they came back, it was all Agassi.
[YT: Goldstein wasn’t even touching the line when he slipped! Agassi just used it as a time out so he could regain his composure.]
Patrick: Agassi then took on an in form Tommy Haas. He’s been having a great year, has Haas, already winning two titles. And he’s only lost two matches on the season: two to Federer and one to Richard Gasquet in a tight Davis Cup match.
Cliff: Well, PMac, don’t forget about that match in Kooyong against Roddick. I know it was just an exhibition match, but Roddick beat him convincingly…
[YT picks up the remote controls, intending to throw them at Cliff’s image on TV, but then thinks better of it]
Patrick: …as we take a look at Agassi sporting the sleeveless look. Agassi wasted set points in the first set, and after that Tommy Haas took control.
Cliff: Interestingly, Roddick has never worn a sleeveless shirt during a match, which I find strange because his physique--
Patrick: --Anyway, we were really looking forward to the match between Tommy Haas and James Blake, who has also won two titles this year. Unfortunately, Haas had food poisoning and he just wasn’t well enough to finish the match.
Cliff: And that really was a disappointment, PMac, because the winner of that match would have taken on Andy Roddick, if Roddick had won. Unfortunately, the no. 3 player in the world and Grand Slam champion Roddick shockingly lost to Igor Andreev in the fourth round.
Patrick: Right. Well, actually, David Nalbandian took over as the world no. 3 after this tournament, and Roddick is now no. 4. Let’s take a look at that match against Andreev. Roddick got broken early in the first set and then couldn’t get a sniff on Andreev’s serve for the whole first set and most of the second set. Roddick, clearly frustrated, actually got a warning from umpire Fergus Murphy for profanity during the second set. In the second set tiebreaker, he started to impose himself more, did Roddick, and look at this… THE DROPPER! to take the set.
Cliff: That really was some supreme artistry by Roddick on that shot.
[YT, unable to restrain herself any longer, flings the controls at the TV but fortunately misses]
Patrick: We thought Roddick would have the momentum going into the third set, and he actually did have 0-40 on Andreev’s first service game of the third set, but he couldn’t convert any of the break points, and it was all Andreev after that. And this set up a quarterfinal showdown with Blake.
Cliff: And Blake really didn’t have much trouble with the Russian, which you have to think, Patrick, is because Andreev was worn out from playing Roddick two days before.
[YT, having nothing left to throw at the TV, resigns herself to having to listen to Cliff’s ridiculous commentary]
Patrick: Well, I think that match meant a lot to James Blake because by winning it, he entered the top 10 for the first time. James Blake has really looked impressive over the last few months, but never more than against Rafael Nadal in the semis here. Nadal hadn’t dropped a set in any of his matches leading up to the semis, but James Blake delivered the Spaniard a shock, beating him soundly in two sets. That was really a great win for James.
Cliff: That’s absolutely true, PMac. I wonder if James’ good buddy Andy Roddick didn’t give him a few tips on how to beat Nadal, because as you may remember, Andy did defeat Nadal at the U.S. Open in 2004.
Patrick: Well, actually James’ himself beat Nadal at the U.S. Open just last year. He seems to be one of the only guys that knows how to beat Nadal. But it was a different story against Roger Federer, the master, in the final. Roger Federer struggled a little bit in the early rounds, actually losing a set to Olivier Rochus, the diminutive Belgian, in the third round. But Federer found his form against Richard Gasquet in the forth round, and just steam-rolled Ivan Ljubicic in quarterfinals.
Cliff: That really was an impressive win for Federer, because Ljubicic, along with guys like Tommy Haas and Andy Roddick, has been one of the hottest players on tour this year.
Patrick: That’s right, Cliff. And then in the semifinals, Federer met the Thai fighter Paradorn Srichaphan. He’s been having a bit of a comeback, has Srichaphan. He credits some of his success this week to his time spent as a Buddhist monk during the off-season. But not even meditation could help Srichaphan beat Federer, who breezed into the finals.
Cliff: Some of you may remember, if you’ve been with us for the last few months, that Andy Roddick beat Srichaphan en route to winning the title in Washington in August.
Patrick: James Blake really took it to Federer at the beginning of the first set of the final. He was actually up two breaks, was Blake. But as always, Federer was able to raise a game to another level and he ended up winning the first set. I think James had a bit of a letdown and that allowed Federer to dominate the next two sets. Final score: 7-5, 6-3, 6-0 for the no. 1.
Patrick: So that wraps up the men’s tournament. Cliff, I’ll turn it over to you and Mary Jo.
Mary Jo: Thanks Patrick. Well, the women’s draw was missing a few of the top players…
[YT: A few? Ten of the top fifteen!]
Mary Jo: …including world no. 1 Kim Clijsters and Australian Open champion Amelie Mauresmo. But it still had some quality players in Justine Henin-Hardenne, Lindsay Davenport, Maria Sharapova, Elena Dementieva, and Martina Hingis. Lindsay Davenport was seeded no. 2 and unluckily for her, she drew Martina Hingis in the fourth round. These two have a long rivalry, with Davenport leading the head to head, but Martina Hingis was the better player in this match, winning in three sets. This was really a big win for Martina in her comeback. Unfortunately for Davenport, she aggravated her back and she won’t be playing in Miami this week.
Cliff: That is a pity, Mary Jo. Lindsay is the top American on the women’s side, and there really aren’t too many promising young Americans following her. That is unlike the men’s tour, where Andy Roddick leads a pack of young Americans.
Mary Jo: Hingis won her quarterfinal match over Dinara Safina, Marat’s little sister, setting up a meeting with Maria Sharapova. This was the third meeting between these two this year. They split the previous two encounters. This time, Sharapova really imposed her power and Hingis couldn’t do much out there.
Cliff: Yes, Sharapova really did play like a champion. She reminds me a little of Andy Roddick, with her powerful serve and ground game, and her good attitude on court…
[YT: I don’t get why everyone says Maria Sharapova has a good attitude on court. Sure, she’s really intense when she’s winning. She’ll scream "Come on!" when she hits a winner while up 6-1, 4-0. But when she’s losing, she’s pouty and looks to be on the verge of tears.]
Mary Jo: In the other semifinal, it was Justine Henin-Hardenne against Elena Dementieva. Henin looked to be in complete control of the match at 6-2, 5-2, but Dementieva stepped it up a notch, and Henin started to choke a little bit. Dementieva ended up winning the match in three tight sets.
Cliff: You know Mary Jo, every time I watch Elena Dementieva play I'm still amazed that she can win, because her serve is just such a problem for her. She can’t win cheap points off it like, say, Andy Roddick.
Mary Jo: That’s true Cliff. And in an all-Russian final, Sharapova was able to expose that, breaking Dementieva numerous times. This was probably Sharapova’s biggest victory since winning the WTA Tour Championships in 2004.
[YT: Maria Sharapova can thank Justine Henin for this victory. If Henin had just closed out the match against Dementieva, she almost certainly would have beaten Shriekapova. Well, when everybody’s back next week in Miami, we’ll see what Sharapova's really made of.]
Cliff: And now we have something really special for you folks at home: a montage of Andy Roddick’s best shots of the tournament. Let me tell you, you don’t want to miss this…
[YT gets up to retrieve the controls, deciding that The World Trick-Shot Billiards Championship doesn’t sound so bad after all.]


That was really funny....Good job....
varun
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 1:02 pm

Submission #2

Postby CraigP on Sun Mar 26, 2006 2:18 pm

The Ones You Didn’t Hear About: Honorees at the Stars for Stars Gala

You might not know this, but the ATP and WTA handed out several awards before the official Stars for Stars Gala in Miami. Here’s a recap:

[b]“Would You Pee In This Cup Just One More Time?â€
CraigP
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 5:26 pm

Postby Djablesse on Sun Mar 26, 2006 2:42 pm

Gah. Can Cliff drop his pants further down for Roddick? Every other sentence there was a reference to something positive about him. I wonder how much he got paid by IMG for each one.
Djablesse
 
Posts: 83
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 2:57 pm

Postby passingshots on Sun Mar 26, 2006 3:33 pm

Djablesse wrote:Gah. Can Cliff drop his pants further down for Roddick? Every other sentence there was a reference to something positive about him. I wonder how much he got paid by IMG for each one.


Wait... are you taking about the transcript I posted? You guys do realize that I made the whole thing up, right? There was no highlight show, obviously.
passingshots
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 1:06 pm

Postby clarity on Sun Mar 26, 2006 3:54 pm

passingshots wrote:
Djablesse wrote:Gah. Can Cliff drop his pants further down for Roddick? Every other sentence there was a reference to something positive about him. I wonder how much he got paid by IMG for each one.


Wait... are you taking about the transcript I posted? You guys do realize that I made the whole thing up, right? There was no highlight show, obviously.


Passingshots,

I'm one who understood that the conversation between Cliff and PMac was fictitious and just a vehicle for reporting the IW results while at the same time expressing your distain for ESPN's tennis coverage and Cliff's incessant Andy Roddick glorification. Maybe it was just too subtle for most, but I thought it was clever and right on.
clarity
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2006 10:47 pm

Postby ccm on Sun Mar 26, 2006 4:35 pm

tds2711 wrote:i think it's important to not try to "please" people. also, it's not about writing something that people definitely agree with either. it's about provoking thought, being clever, funny, interesting, factual, etc.

that's why blogging is cool. it's not news reporting. you can be opinionated -- meaning most people wont like or agree with your style or opinion..

yup, it's about being opinionated, but, like any writing, it should also be readable. most of the efforts so far have been on the dense side without the content to back it up. and actually, so far the opinions have been pretty middle-of-the-road. that would be ok if the writing style were more developed. i get the feeling i'm reading tennis enthusiasts or experts who are taking a turn at writing rather than writers who have an interest in tennis. the writing makes the blog.

some good ideas though. just nothing that wows.
User avatar
ccm
 
Posts: 2935
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 2:48 pm

Postby Kevin on Sun Mar 26, 2006 7:48 pm

Perhaps tennis-x, instead of finding just one blogger, could take a sampling of the "best of the x-board" each week. That would have more variety, encourage more x-board participation (and hopefully quality, not just quantity), and you don't have to pay those writers, either.
User avatar
Kevin
 
Posts: 1086
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 2:43 pm
Location: You got soul, you got class, you got style, cuz you're badass

Postby tds2711 on Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:21 pm

yea but i also think so far you all are impossible to please. i mean you even show disdain for bodo, bricker, etc. maybe Xbot will tell us who he/she thinks is good thus far...

what do we have 7 or 8 contestants?
tds2711
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:19 pm

Postby ccm on Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:33 pm

tds2711 wrote:yea but i also think so far you all are impossible to please. i mean you even show disdain for bodo, bricker, etc. \

bodo & bricker? those are some pretty low standards.
User avatar
ccm
 
Posts: 2935
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 2:48 pm

Postby tds2711 on Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:38 pm

"yup, it's about being opinionated, but, like any writing, it should also be readable. most of the efforts so far have been on the dense side without the content to back it up. and actually, so far the opinions have been pretty middle-of-the-road. that would be ok if the writing style were more developed. i get the feeling i'm reading tennis enthusiasts or experts who are taking a turn at writing rather than writers who have an interest in tennis. the writing makes the blog."

so what exactly are you looking for from these people??? at least i know it's better than i can do.
tds2711
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:19 pm

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron
Copyright © 2003-2008 Tennis-X.com. All rights reserved.
This website is an independently operated source of news and information and is not affiliated with any professional organization.